Nick the Sagacious agreed to debate me on his channel. I liked what he had to say on his channel, with the exception of his Christian views. I decided to debate him on this video. This is part 1 of the debate.
Kent Hovind proves a young earth again, but this time he does it with ice cores. I heard Ken Ham give this argument in the debate with Bill Nye and I didn’t have an immediate answer to the planes, but after researching it, it’s just as stupid as everything else they say. Here’s the explanation.
I covered seven fallacies in the last part. In this video, I cover a total of six logical fallacies or methods of reasoning. Here are the first five:
- Deductive Reasoning (Formal/Informal)
- Inductive Reasoning
- Argument From Ignorance
- Argument From Inertia
- Circular Reasoning
Plus the extra:
- God of the Gaps
In this video, I cover a total of 7, with 2 extras. Here are the first five:
- Confirmation Bias
- Special Pleading
- Shifting the Burden of Proof
- False Dichotomy
With two extras:
- Black Swan Fallacy
- Argument by Emotive Language
Kent Hovind lies about the age of the earth – again. I know, big surprise. Dude’s completely full of shit. But I debunk him with logic and cool drawings.
Kent hovind claims that due to the inverse square law, the moon would have been right on top of the earth 1.2 million years ago. He is incorrect. I do the math to show it.
Kent Hovind thinks he proves a young earth, but really he’s proving what a dipshit he is. He makes claims with absolutely no supporting evidence. But isn’t that the pattern of christians?
Kent Hovind is back to talk more shit about evolution. In this episode, he talks about hammer-proof roaches and pigs the size of Texas, and I talk about why he’s an idiot.
Another Kent Hovind video. This guy is something else. In this video, I debunk his claims about evolution. Spoiler: I rip him a new asshole.
In this video, I expounded upon Hemant Mehta’s video about Jehovah’s Witnesses. I really like and respect Hemant Mehta. I was giving my viewpoint on the subject from an insider’s perspective.